1613border
  • 1 The Green Wall
  • 2 How Building the Border Wall Changed San Diego
  • 3 Opposition of California State Assembly Bill 54 (SB 54)
  • 4 Border Visits by Attorney General and DHS Secretary
  • 5 National Border Patrol Council Convention 2017
  • The Green Wall

    The human line of protection at the border

    By Vanessa Yurkevich

    There's already a wall along the entire southern border with Mexico -- just not the one President Donald Trump pledged to build. Over a disjointed 1,300 miles where there's no fence or concrete structure, there's just men and women in green uniforms -- border patrol agents who call themselves the "green wall."

    View the article here

    Read More
  • How Building the Border Wall Changed San Diego

    In 1986, the San Diego Border Patrol sector accounted for approximately one-third of all apprehensions along the U.S.-Mexico border. Today, it accounts for only a small fraction.

    How did the region go from one of the busiest sectors for illegal border crossings to one of the most secure? In our latest edition of “Underreported,” The Daily Signal visits the U.S.-Mexico border in San Diego to find out.

    View the article here.

    Read More
  • Opposition of California State Assembly Bill 54 (SB 54)

    Monday, April 24, 2017

    NBPC Local 1613 would like to thank the Peace Officers Research Association of California (PORAC) for their support of Law Enforcement officers at every level and their opposition of California Senate Bill 54 (SB 54).

    NBPC Local 1613 would also like to state that the supporters of this bill fail to mention the fact that legal measures are already codified to protect victims of crimes and those reporting crimes such as "T" and "U" visas. They would have the public believe that victims and those reporting crimes would be the focus of immigration enforcement actions rather than the criminals we are trying to protect the public from. This bill would seriously inhibit the ability of Border Patrol Agents to protect the public by limiting our access to databases and our collaborations with other Law Enforcement agencies.

    The following is the full statement from PORAC.

    SB 54: “Sanctuary State”

    Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León is attempting to keep law enforcement agencies from cooperating with federal immigration agents with his introduction of SB 54. This bill is one of the highest-profile bills in California, as it goes directly against President Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration.

    SB 54 would place certain restrictions on state and local government entities in their interactions with federal immigration authorities. PORAC opposes this measure for three critical reasons:

    The bill requires a local law enforcement agency to report to the Department of Justice if they are involved in special immigration task forces. These task forces can be costly and possibly non-reimbursable. Additionally, federal funding to our local agencies could be put at risk.

    SB 54 plans to remove people with immigrant status from California jails and place them in an outside detention facility — thus separating them from their families, communities and networks, and creating even more difficulties in the family unit.

    The breakdown of local, state and federal partnerships will prevent our officers from being able to do their jobs; therefore, violent criminals will remain on the streets and our families will be in danger.

    PORAC’s main concern is public safety. We protect all Californians, immigrants and nonimmigrants alike. By targeting immigrants who are not criminals, we violate all that we stand for and lose the trust we have within our communities.

    Read More
  • Border Visits by Attorney General and DHS Secretary

    The National Border Patrol Council and Local 1613 continue to push for the resources and Agents needed to secure the border. A comprehensive package with the funding of the wall that includes increased manpower, pay parity (FLSA), vehicles, roads, radios and cameras is needed. This funding should be allocated to the Border Patrol directly. Changes also need to be made to the hiring process and the overall structure of CBP. Border Patrol Agents also need a better career ladder and actions must be taken to mitigate the high attrition rates. These are a few of the things that need to be addressed going forward. 

    NBPC Local 1613 is cautiously optimistic by the statements of Attorney Genreal Sessions and DHS Secretary Kelly. We encourage them to continue beyond the words and ensure the necessary actions are taken to give the Border Patrol the resources needed to truly secure the border.

    NBPC Media spokesman Chris Cabrera discusses visit from the attorney general and the DHS secretary

    NBPC Local 1613 President Terence L. Shigg discusses visit from Attorney General and DHS Secretary.

    Read More
  • National Border Patrol Council Convention 2017

    The NBPC and McAllister and Quinn lobbying firm are optimistic that we will be able to get FLSA back for our members. There have been several factors that have made this more of a real possiblity. One being the Presidents executive order that called for the  hiring of 5,000 new BPA's and 10,000 new ICE officers. Another is the fact that (A) CBP Commisioner Mcaleenan and DHS Secretary Kelly have made statements in favor of pay parity within CBP. These are but two of the reasons NBPC believes we can get FLSA back.

    See the full notes for more information from the convention. 

    NBPC MARCH 2017 MEETING NOTES.pdf

     

    Read More

Upcoming Events

Jul
11

July 11, 2017 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm

Aug
8

August 08, 2017 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm

Member News

  • NBPC 1613 Elections +

    The following candidates were nominated for office at the October 11, 2016 membership meeting: President: Terence L. Shigg1st Vice President: Read More
  • Welcome to the new 1613 website! +

    Welcome to the new Local 1613 website. We have taken some time to get this new site up and running Read More
  • Nominations for Local 1613 Executive Board +

    September 26, 2016 (As posted in station bulletin boards) Nominations for the offices of President, 1st Vice President, 2nd Vice Read More
  • 1
  • 2

Know Your Rights

  • Article 26 C +

    Article 26 C - Except in emergency, the Agency agrees to schedule eight hours between changes in shifts, and when practical, Read More
  • Article 26 B +

    Article 26 B - The Employer agrees to make every effort to avoid requiring employees to perform continuous automobile travel for Read More
  • Article 17 A +

    Article 17 A - The Employer agrees to provide a safe and healthful working conditions. Employees are prohibited from using vehicles Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10